Diagram: a master brand above four sub-brands, with Product C beneath Sub-brand C and Endorsed E beneath Sub-brand D. The nodes start scattered and settle into this hierarchy.

Capability 05Portfolio structure and naming

Brand architecture for a growing portfolio.

We audit the brands you carry, choose the architecture model, set naming rules and plan a phased migration. Customers can then find the right offer, and each new product has a place.

Typical length
4–8 weeks
Scope
Portfolio-wide
Covers
Model · naming · migration

A-101Portfolio audit

Every brand you carry, mapped before any model.

Every brand, product and label you carry: what each costs, what it earns and where customers get lost. Each brand is plotted by awareness and role clarity, then given a proposed action: keep, endorse, merge or retire.

Portfolio · 9 brands · sized by share of revenue

Illustrative

A-102What we offer

Six deliverables, from audit to governance.

This work is for companies whose brands, products and acquisitions have outgrown the rules that connect them. Read the drawing from the ground floor up.

  1. L+05 06

    Architecture governance

    The new-brand test

    Roof: who approves new brands

    Who decides when a new brand is needed, and the test each proposal must pass.

  2. L+04 05

    Migration plan

    Phased

    Circulation: how you move from old to new

    The order for moving to the new structure without confusing customers or breaking what works.

  3. L+03 04

    Naming system

    Naming rules

    Signage: what things are called

    Names for products, tiers and features, with rules for naming the next one.

  4. L+02 03

    Relationship rules

    Lockups · hierarchy

    Connections: how brands meet

    How the master brand and each sub-brand appear together: lockups, hierarchy, spacing and where they stay apart.

  5. L+01 02

    Architecture model

    Model on evidence

    Frame: the model everything hangs from

    Branded house, endorsed, house of brands or a hybrid, chosen on evidence with the trade-offs written down.

  6. L+00 01

    Portfolio audit

    Every brand you carry

    Foundation: what exists today

    Every brand, product and label you carry: what each costs, what it earns and where customers get lost.

Printed floor plans stacked on a wooden table
DetailFloor by floor: nothing is built until the one below it holds

A-103Choosing a model

Architecture models, compared on one portfolio.

Branded house, endorsed, house of brands or a hybrid, chosen on evidence with the trade-offs written down. Move along the spectrum, pick a situation and see what the agent recommends before your board decides.

Each brand leads with its own name; the parent vouches for it.

Situation

Architecture agentRecommends

Endorsed

Brand N has its own customers and recognition. Endorsing it keeps both while trust in the parent grows; a full rename can follow once equity has moved.

Trade-offs at Endorsed

Cost to run
3/5
Equity transfer
3/5
Focus
4/5

The agent proposes a model and scores the trade-offs; the portfolio board decides and signs the decision record.

Interactive: a range slider moves the portfolio between four architecture models; situation buttons change the agent’s recommendation and trade-off scores; the decide button records the chosen position.

A-104Relationship rules

How brands appear together, in exact proportions.

How the master brand and each sub-brand appear together: lockups, hierarchy, spacing and where they stay apart.

Relationship

Endorsed

  1. The endorsed brand leads; the parent sits beneath, never beside.
  2. Endorsement line at 42% of the lead name’s height.
  3. Parent colour only in the endorsement, never in the lead name.

Where they do not meetPack fronts under 40 mm: endorsement moves to the back panel.

Lockup builder: choose a relationship to see a generic lockup with its ratio, clear space, minimum size and rules.

A-105Naming system

Four questions decide whether a product earns its own name.

Names for products, tiers and features, with rules for naming the next one. Who decides when a new brand is needed, and the test each proposal must pass.

Nomenclature
  1. Your brandMaster
  2. Sub-brandOnly if it passes
  3. TierCore · Plus · Pro
  4. DescriptorPlain words

Question 1 of 4Awaiting answer

Is it a new offer, rather than a size, version or variant of one you already sell?

Variants never get names of their own.

A-106Customer navigation

The customer’s route through your portfolio, before and after.

When brands are arranged in the order they arrived, customers turn back and give up. Follow one customer looking for the right Segment A option, then switch the plan.

Illustrative
Plan of the portfolio with a customer route from the entrance to Sub-brand A Sub-brand B Label F Master brand Endorsed E Range G Sub-brand D Product C Sub-brand A Sub-brand C Sub-brand A · Segment A Sub-brand C · Segment B Core · Plus · Pro Endorsed E · by Your brand Your brand · entry Entrance

A-107Migration plan

A phased migration that moves each brand in an agreed order.

The order for moving to the new structure without confusing customers or breaking what works. Play the six quarters to see which brand moves when, with the risk and measure for each.

Illustrative

Migration timeline: step through six quarters; seven brands move between Keep, Endorse, Merge and Retire, with the risk and measure for each quarter.

A-108How it works

Three phases, each ending in a decision.

Map the portfolio, choose the model, then name and migrate. 8 weeks in total, with what agents prepare and what people decide in each room.

Wk 01–02 · 2 weeks

Map

Every brand and product you carry, how customers move between them and what each costs to maintain.

You keep

  • Portfolio map
  • Customer navigation review
  • Cost of complexity
Agents work
Inventory every brand, name and touchpoint; cluster search and journey data into a first navigation map.
People decide
Interview brand owners and customers; confirm what each brand is for.
A card and paper site model of low buildings among model trees on a gridded base
Fig. 05Worked out in the model before it is built

A-109What you get

Each document answers one question about your portfolio.

Documents are numbered, made in formats your teams already use and dated to the week they are signed.

IllustrativeIssue weeks follow the eight-week plan; each engagement sets its own.

Deliverables register: sheet number, title, format, the question each answers and the week it is issued
SheetTitleFormatAnswersIssued
A-201 Portfolio map & audit FigmaSheet Which brands exist, what each costs and earns, where customers get lost. Wk 02
A-202 Architecture model & decision record Document Which model, why and what was traded away to choose it. Wk 05
A-203 Relationship & lockup rules Guidelines How any two brands appear together, and where they never meet. Wk 05
A-204 Naming system & nomenclature Document What the next product, tier or feature is called, without a debate. Wk 08
A-205 Migration plan · phased Roadmap What moves when, in what order, with which risks watched. Wk 08
A-206 New-brand test One page Whether a proposal deserves a brand at all. Wk 08

Agent keeps the register current and checks every sheet against the decision record. People sign each sheet before it is issued.

A set of architectural drawings spread across a work surface
SetEvery sheet numbered, signed and issued as one set

A-110What changes

What gets simpler once the structure holds.

Progress is measured against the baseline taken before migration: navigation, search share and brand recall.

Looking up into a steel roof structure where repeating beams meet in clear lines
Fig. 06A clear structure carries the load
  1. S-01

    Customers find their way

    The structure follows how people buy, not how the org chart grew.

  2. S-02

    Fewer brands, more equity

    Each brand you keep has a clear role, so investment builds fewer, stronger names.

  3. S-03

    The next launch has a home

    New products get a name and a place from agreed rules, without last-minute debates.

Services & packages

Brand architecture services for growing portfolios.

Start with a portfolio audit or one naming decision, or commission the full model and a phased migration. Each recommendation comes with its evidence and trade-offs in writing.

Categories
04
Services
16
Packages
04
Not sure what you need? Describe the problem

How to buy

  1. 01Pick services. Enquire about one, or add several to a brief.
  2. 02Choose a package. A sprint, a fixed project or an ongoing team.
  3. 03Send the brief. We reply within one working day.

Browse by category

Timelines are typical. Every quote follows a written scope.

01Portfolio & model

5 services
Typical timeline: 2–3 weeks

Portfolio audit

We map every brand, sub-brand, product and label you carry: what each costs and earns, and where customers get lost between them.

What’s included

  • Portfolio map of every brand
  • Customer navigation review
  • Cost-of-complexity estimate
  • Brands to keep, merge or retire
  • Entry point
  • Diagnostic

Best forPortfolios that grew by launch and acquisition rather than design

Typical timeline: 4–6 weeks

Portfolio equity study

Research that measures the recognition and preference each brand carries, so keep, merge and retire decisions rest on evidence.

What’s included

  • Awareness and preference by brand
  • Equity transfer testing
  • Customer attachment interviews
  • Equity ranking across the portfolio
  • Research
  • Evidence

Best forPortfolios facing merge or retire decisions on established names

Typical timeline: 4–6 weeks

Architecture model

We test branded house, endorsed, house of brands and hybrid models against your growth plans and customer behaviour, then your leaders choose one.

What’s included

  • Model options with scenarios
  • Customer testing of structures
  • Decision record and rationale
  • Leadership decision session
  • Core
  • Customer-tested

Best forCompanies whose brand structure no longer matches how customers buy

Typical timeline: 3–4 weeks

Relationship & lockup rules

Rules for how the master brand and each sub-brand appear together: lockups, hierarchy, spacing and where they never meet.

What’s included

  • Endorsement levels and lockups
  • Hierarchy and spacing rules
  • Co-branding and partner rules
  • Artwork for every lockup
  • Lockups
  • Visual rules

Best forBrands with sub-brands, endorsed products or partner co-branding

Typical timeline: 3–5 weeks

Brand extension assessment

We test with customers, before launch, whether the master brand can stretch to a new category, audience or price point without harming either side.

What’s included

  • Stretch and fit analysis
  • Customer testing of extension concepts
  • Risk to the core brand assessed
  • Recommendation and brand route
  • Stretch test
  • Pre-launch

Best forBrands considering a new category or price tier

02Naming

4 services
Typical timeline: 3–5 weeks

Naming system & nomenclature

Rules for when a product, tier or feature earns its own name and when it gets a plain descriptor.

What’s included

  • Naming principles and territories
  • Tier and descriptor ladder
  • Rules for features and editions
  • Current names mapped to the system
  • Nomenclature
  • Naming rules

Best forProduct companies adding offers faster than they can name them

Typical timeline: 3–6 weeks

Product & sub-brand naming

New product, service or sub-brand names that fit your naming system, checked for meaning and conflicts in each market you sell in.

What’s included

  • Naming brief within the system
  • Long list and shortlist
  • Linguistic checks by market
  • Preliminary trademark screening
  • Naming
  • Multi-market

Best forLaunch teams that need a name that fits the brand family

Typical timeline: 3–5 weeks

Naming rationalisation

We review every product and feature name against the naming system and recommend which stay, become descriptors or retire, and in what order.

What’s included

  • Inventory of current names
  • Keep, rename or retire recommendations
  • Customer impact assessment
  • Renaming sequence
  • Clean-up
  • Phased

Best forPortfolios with overlapping or confusing product names

Typical timeline: 1–2 weeks

New-brand test

A four-question test a proposal must pass to earn its own name, with the outcomes and who decides, so naming debates end before launch.

What’s included

  • Decision test as a one-page flow
  • Outcomes: descriptor, sub-brand, new brand
  • Decision rights and approvers
  • Worked examples from your portfolio
  • Entry point
  • One page

Best forOrganisations where every team wants a brand of its own

03Customer wayfinding

3 services
Typical timeline: 3–4 weeks

Customer navigation research

Tree tests, card sorts and interviews that show how customers find, compare and choose between your offers, as evidence for the structure.

What’s included

  • Card sorts and tree tests
  • Customer interviews
  • Search and analytics review
  • Navigation findings and priorities
  • Research
  • Evidence

Best forPortfolios where customers pick the wrong product, or none

Typical timeline: 4–6 weeks

Web & product wayfinding

We turn the architecture into navigation: site structure, product menus and range pages ordered the way customers look for things.

What’s included

  • Site and product structure
  • Navigation and labelling rules
  • Range and comparison page design
  • Prototypes tested on key routes
  • Digital
  • Navigation
  • Figma

Best forBrands whose website mirrors the org chart

Typical timeline: 2–4 weeks

Domain & digital estate plan

Which brands get their own domain, app or social account and which sit inside the master brand’s, with your digital estate mapped to match.

What’s included

  • Audit of domains, apps and handles
  • Estate structure mapped to the model
  • Redirect and consolidation plan
  • Search visibility risks flagged
  • Digital estate
  • Consolidation

Best forBrands with sprawling domains, microsites, apps and social handles

04Migration & governance

4 services
Typical timeline: 3–4 weeks

Migration plan

A phased plan to move from today’s portfolio to the new structure without confusing customers or breaking what works.

What’s included

  • Phased migration roadmap
  • Sequence by risk and return
  • Customer and staff communications plan
  • Measures to track each phase
  • Phased
  • Sequenced by risk

Best forAny architecture change that touches live products and customers

Typical timeline: 4–8 weeks

M&A brand integration

Whether to keep, endorse, merge or retire an acquired or merged brand, decided on equity evidence and planned so customers and staff come with you.

What’s included

  • Equity assessment of both brands
  • Integration options and recommendation
  • Day-one and transition identity
  • Integration roadmap
  • M&A
  • Time-critical

Best forAcquirers and merging organisations, before and after the deal closes

Typical timeline: 3–12 months, phased

Migration delivery

We run the migration with your teams phase by phase, covering artwork, digital, signage and communications, with a review and decision after each phase.

What’s included

  • Phase plans and checklists
  • Artwork and asset updates
  • Supplier and agency coordination
  • Review gate after each phase
  • Gated phases
  • Hands-on

Best forLarge portfolios moving to a new structure across many markets

Typical timeline: 2–3 weeks

Architecture governance

Who decides when a new brand is needed, the route a proposal follows and the forum that approves it, so you launch fewer, better brands.

What’s included

  • Decision rights and forum
  • Proposal template and business case
  • Annual portfolio review
  • Governance handbook
  • Governance
  • Annual review

Best forGroups with several business units launching brands independently

Your brief

Tick “Add to brief” on any service, choose a package, then continue. Or enquire about one service directly.

How we work with you

Ways to engage, from a question to an RFQ.

Ask a quick question, send a project brief or issue a formal RFQ. The lead for the work reads each one in full, and any services already in your brief go with it.

Or book a thirty-minute call

What are you sending?

  1. 01

    About 2 minutes4 required answers

    For a first conversation, a press request or anything that does not need a scope yet.

    You get A reply from a named lead

  2. 02Recommended

    About 8 minutes5 short steps

    Goals, audiences, a budget band and timing, so our first reply can outline the work.

    You get Options and a first scope after one call

  3. 03

    About 15 minutesYour documents attached

    Your documents, deadlines and the procurement and security rules the work must meet.

    You get Receipt confirmed and a named bid lead

How it is priced

Each package shows its pricing model. Work starts once a written scope and quote are agreed.

  • Typical length
    1–3 weeks
    Pricing
    Fixed fee
  • Typical length
    4–12 weeks
    Pricing
    Fixed price
  • Typical length
    3–9 months
    Pricing
    Fixed price per milestone
  • Typical length
    6–18 months
    Pricing
    Programme fee · by statement of work
Compare what each package includes
What each package includes and who it suits
PackageEvery engagement includesBest for
SprintA short, fixed-scope engagement that answers one defined question.
  • Scope and outcome agreed before day one
  • A senior lead plus the specialists needed
  • A working review every week
  • A decision-ready answer or prototype
Discovery, a diagnostic, a prototype or a decision you need to make soon
ProjectA defined scope, delivered for a fixed price.
  • Statement of work with deliverables and acceptance criteria
  • A named project lead and a fixed team
  • A shared plan with dated checkpoints
  • Source files, yours once paid for
Work you can describe up front: an identity, a platform or a set of tools
MilestoneA larger build in phases you approve and pay for one at a time.
  • Phases with their own scope, output and sign-off
  • A go or no-go review at every gate
  • Re-planning between phases as you learn
  • Payment tied to accepted milestones
Programmes too large for one contract, where you want control at each step
EnterpriseA multi-workstream programme with a dedicated team, governance and agreed service levels.
  • An engagement director and a steering group
  • A dedicated team across several workstreams
  • Service levels, reporting and a risk register
  • Security, legal and procurement reviews in the plan
Large organisations running change across markets, portfolios or business units

A-111Questions

What leaders ask about brand architecture.

Questions leadership teams bring to the first meeting, each linked to the deliverable that answers it.

When your portfolio confuses customers or your own teams. Typical triggers are a new product nobody agrees how to name, two offers customers mix up or an acquired brand to integrate.

See sheet A-201 · Portfolio map & audit

Only where a current name costs you customers or equity. The migration plan sets when each rename happens, so customers can follow the change.

See sheet A-205 · Migration plan

We test each model against your growth plans and how customers navigate. Your leadership chooses, and the decision record lists the trade-offs so the choice holds when people change.

See sheet A-202 · Decision record

Yes. The model decides where an acquired brand sits, and the migration plan sets when and how it moves.

See sheet A-205 · Migration plan

A question not answered here?

Book a call

A-112Brand Design · Brand Design

Six Brand Design capabilities, bought alone or together.

Brand Architecture is one of six Brand Design capabilities. The two marked are the ones an architecture brief most often needs alongside it.

A white site model of low buildings and streets seen from above at an angle
Fig. 07Every building earns its place on the plot

Tell us what you need built.

You will speak to a lead who would run the work, and get a straight answer on fit.

Book a call

Three ways to start

Every engagement starts with a written scope and a quote agreed before work begins.

Choose one of the three ways above